Universal Compression vs. Custom Zonal Compression (.jpg)
Posted by datonn on September 4th, 2008When it comes to .jpg optimization, the general advice out there is pretty consistent:
- size your images to the dimensions they are being displayed (using image editors, NOT your web development tools).
- use grayscale or black and white imagery over color if you can…as fewer colors will result in smaller overall file sizes.
- apply 10-20+ percent compression to any imagery being saved for on-screen display.
When sites out there are telling you to use compression, they are telling you to use a UNIVERSAL rate of compression…the same rate of compression being consistently applied over an entire image. Most image editors will only allow you to apply universal compression settings when optimizing imagery! This becomes a problem in many instances, as the higher the rate of compression you apply to an image, the worse it will ultimately look…especially after multiple edits and saves. It also is highly inefficient, as different regions of each image can use different amounts of compression to achieve the combination of best image appearance and smallest overall file size.
My preferred solution is to use a heavy-dose of custom zonal compression and a minimal amount of universal compression. This technique will often produce similar to smaller image file sizes, with one important distinction: preserving the ability to edit said images at some point in the future without experiencing a significant amount of quality loss. Read the rest of this entry »



